Firm News
Greg Carlin and Kim Davis Publish
August 14, 2011
The article discusses a recent case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), Cancer Research Technology, Ltd. v. Barr Laboratories (CRT v. Barr). Carlin and Davis summarize the current state of the law on prosecution laches in view of CRT v. Barr and provide guidelines for practitioners needing to balance client needs with equitable obligations of timely prosecution.
The article appears in Volume 18, Issue 2 of Georgia State University’s Journal of Intellectual Property Law. View
Related Insights
Women’s History Month Featuring Meg Cogburn
1. Who or what has inspired you the most in your career, especially as a woman in your field? There...
READ
MORE
Women’s History Month Featuring Amy Khoshaba
1. What’s one thing you’ve accomplished in your career that you’re most proud of? One of the accomplishments I am...
READ
MORE
Women’s History Month Featuring Tricia Alley
1. What’s a proud moment you’ve had as a woman in your career? Every day of my 42 year...
READ
MORE